↓ Skip to main content

Wolters Kluwer

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Convalescent Plasma Versus Standard Plasma in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infected Hospitalized Patients in New York: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial*

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care Medicine, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
46 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Convalescent Plasma Versus Standard Plasma in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infected Hospitalized Patients in New York: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial*
Published in
Critical Care Medicine, April 2021
DOI 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005066
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elliott Bennett-Guerrero, Jamie L Romeiser, Lillian R Talbot, Tahmeena Ahmed, Linda J Mamone, Sunitha M Singh, Janet C Hearing, Huda Salman, Dishaw D Holiprosad, Alex T Freedenberg, Jason A Carter, Nicholas J Browne, Megan E Cosgrove, Margaret E Shevik, Laura M Generale, Margaret A Andrew, Sharon Nachman, Bettina C Fries

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 6 7%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 44 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 48 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,237,383
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#710
of 9,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,451
of 452,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#23
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.