@defcon201nj @ERINBROPHY18 Ivermectin works. Always has, always will. https://t.co/3pVSqo9CeC
@_TheAncientOne_ @DiedSuddenly_ O sufferer of Trump Derangement Syndrome, ivermectin is an effective treatment, and also can prevent serious infection, of Covid19 if given before or immediately after infection. Even the US gov now admits this. https://t.co
@FailboatAdmiral @sax_n_violets @RealCanadia @catturd2 It’s disingenuous to ask for a long term study on it at this time bc it’s only been a couple years. However, the studies we do have prove that ivermectin does help (even if it’s a little) prevent deat
@GCarabine @Zachariahskylab @BretWeinstein "Meta-analysis of these 3 trials, assessing 738 participants, found that ivermectin prophylaxis among health care workers and COVID-19 contacts probably reduces the risk of COVID-19 infection by an average of 86%"
@AlexBerenson This meta analysis of RCTs on Ivermectin with a total of 3,406 participants concluded that "Ivermectin is likely to be an equitable, acceptable, and feasible global intervention against COVID-19 . . . in both treatment and prophylaxis." http
@ChaosExhaustion @VigilantFox @RobertKennedyJr @megynkelly @PierreKory "Meta-analysis of these 3 trials, assessing 738 participants, found that ivermectin prophylaxis among health care workers and COVID-19 contacts probably reduces the risk of COVID-19 inf
"Meta-analysis of 15 trials, assessing 2438 participants, found that "Ivermectin" reduced the risk of death by an average of 62% (95% CI 27%–81%) compared with no ivermectin treatment" https://t.co/zh14UQxbZX
@BMFPerspective @lucashartleyhow @VigilantFox @brodysmom_424 IVERMECTIN for Cov2 https://t.co/nOE0KvnGyb Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Gu
@SAVoltolin @VigilantFox @RobertKennedyJr "Meta-analysis of these 3 trials, assessing 738 participants, found that ivermectin prophylaxis among health care workers and COVID-19 contacts probably reduces the risk of COVID-19 infection by an average of 86%"
@Studio26151 @NortiLess .....Also: IVERMECTIN for Cov2 https://t.co/nOE0KvnGyb Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines https://t.co/Wdoy
@WBATDM @lawrie_dr "Meta-analysis of these 3 trials, assessing 738 participants, found that ivermectin prophylaxis among health care workers and COVID-19 contacts probably reduces the risk of COVID-19 infection by an average of 86%" https://t.co/l7eD6pTnG7
@dr_jon_l This Meta-analysis from American Journal of Therapeutics says it works. Not arguing. Looking for answers. https://t.co/V93j2U2sqO
@NamelessGhoulTX @Covid19Critical @FreeWCH Meta-analysis from The American Journal of Therapeutics says it works https://t.co/V93j2U2sqO
@AlastairMcA30 @Covid19Critical @FreeWCH Hmm, 🤔 Meta analysis from the American Journal of Therapeutics https://t.co/V93j2U2sqO
@AlastairMcA30 This Meta-analysis from the American Journal of Therapeutics says it does work. I'm getting conflicting information. https://t.co/V93j2U2sqO
RT @AJ32800278: @FreeWCH Dr. Tess Lawrie, a WHO expert in analysis of medical evidence, shows we have more than evidence for Ivermectin use…
@HaHaGentherapie @mandooow1 @maria_vansant Ga de data dan eens bestuderen. Geloven doe je maar in de kerk hoor. Hcq: https://t.co/VkAl9aeaPn https://t.co/53XAohoj1r Ivermectine: https://t.co/mQayuOj0iz https://t.co/1g1szEZgHN
RT @BellaDodds: @c_plushie @RobertKennedyJr @P_McCulloughMD @PierreKory @DrHarveyRisch @NassMeryl "Moderate-certainty evidence finds that l…
@c_plushie @RobertKennedyJr @P_McCulloughMD @PierreKory @DrHarveyRisch @NassMeryl "Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers pr
RT @DrDrstoller: @LizaMaria5D @unhealthytruth @ItsMichaelRay1 there are many studies... not just from this year: https://t.co/3J3yitYmAt
@LizaMaria5D @unhealthytruth @ItsMichaelRay1 there are many studies... not just from this year: https://t.co/3J3yitYmAt
@TheChiefNerd @RobertKennedyJr Tess Lawrie's meta analysis https://t.co/xX4d34mrsW
RT @justjodes68: @CamLangton @CKellyUAP Look at the work of Dr tess lawrie. https://t.co/JcTFRcDAgi
@ObamaSaidWhat1 @ChuckCallesto This one is a real research paper might be hard for you to understand - https://t.co/3LCcF0DvyD
@CamLangton @CKellyUAP Look at the work of Dr tess lawrie. https://t.co/JcTFRcDAgi
RT @OffCyndisc: Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19... : American Journal of Therapeutics https://t.co/nAWssYVJtu
@bellmardesigns @krassenstein @Inventitnow To be fair to you, it only says "moderate-certainty" so more research is needed, but that's pretty good for a guess from...what did you say? I believe you said something along the lines of taking advice from a pha
@Creativologist @NikkiPreston107 There has been enough test in the US. By individuals. The reason IVM was squashed is there’s no money in it. $0.20 a pill vs $40 a shot. Scroll down to conclusion https://t.co/R0wMcfoLkm
@holgerjh @GeoffreyPlitt @shanley_dennis @ChuckCallesto How about this??? "Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressi
@iainz1 @zaptrapped @sissyroxx Give this a read. I highly doubt you will... https://t.co/x6umNH6pK3
RT @OffCyndisc: Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19... : American Journal of Therapeutics https://t.co/nAWssYVJtu
RT @TruthCampaigns: This medicine didn’t need to be repurposed for treatments of patients sick with #Covid19 it was already used as an #an…
This medicine didn’t need to be repurposed for treatments of patients sick with #Covid19 it was already used as an #antiviral & anthelmintic in Human & animal #Medicine #Covid #Pandemic #Ivermectin #MedTwitter what Big pharma did was prevent #hea
Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19... : American Journal of Therapeutics https://t.co/nAWssYVJtu
@leslibless Ivermectin works. https://t.co/JkuUjdYVaN
@birdieswan @leslibless It works. https://t.co/JkuUjdYVaN
RT @ThomasSayre13: @djoflowerpower @RonFilipkowski @RcRegalstarfire Ivermectin users fare best, it seems. "ivermectin prophylaxis reduced…
RT @kennytexas: @MdBreathe @DavidWolfe @RobertApter1 @drpaulmarik1 @BoydenGrayAssoc You know who agrees? The NIH. I’m a little surprised th…
Interesting study from the NIH.... https://t.co/M5ddRzTKpz
@djoflowerpower @RonFilipkowski @RcRegalstarfire Ivermectin users fare best, it seems. "ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%–91%)" https://t.co/DgiPP3q05L
RT @jimmy_dore: @Rachelanthecity Here’s another study that wasn’t funded by big pharma: https://t.co/5FBVTty3cT https://t.co/EbcpCKoB4g
@Woooeee3 @RealPotatus @djoflowerpower @RonFilipkowski @RcRegalstarfire Dr. Tess Lawrie, a WHO expert in analysis of medical evidence, shows we have more than evidence for Ivermectin used for Covid19 with peer-reviewed paper published in American Journal
@backell @SininStyle @burnsurvior @ChuckCallesto @drzoegrey It’s on the WHO list of essential medicines. https://t.co/Fy3zEPXCPE ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86%
@ChuckCallesto On the NIH website: https://t.co/Fy3zEPX506 ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86%
@ViewLiberty @JJeff4t @ChuckCallesto Highly encourage you to check out this article from the NIH: https://t.co/tbAPk9oPeb If you don't have the time to read the whole thing, the conclusion gives you enough to at least suggest that ivermectin helps with mo
RT @jimmy_dore: @Rachelanthecity Here’s another study that wasn’t funded by big pharma: https://t.co/5FBVTty3cT https://t.co/EbcpCKoB4g
RT @jimmy_dore: @Rachelanthecity Here’s another study that wasn’t funded by big pharma: https://t.co/5FBVTty3cT https://t.co/EbcpCKoB4g
RT @jimmy_dore: @Rachelanthecity Here’s another study that wasn’t funded by big pharma: https://t.co/5FBVTty3cT https://t.co/EbcpCKoB4g
RT @jimmy_dore: @Rachelanthecity Here’s another study that wasn’t funded by big pharma: https://t.co/5FBVTty3cT https://t.co/EbcpCKoB4g
@BangeWilliam @jimmy_dore @klpjustice1 No thats libs. Saw a vid of a dude use a cup to collect horse piss then drink it. Got some reading for you tho https://t.co/x6umNH6pK3
RT @jimmy_dore: @Rachelanthecity Here’s another study that wasn’t funded by big pharma: https://t.co/5FBVTty3cT https://t.co/EbcpCKoB4g
@MdBreathe @DavidWolfe @RobertApter1 @drpaulmarik1 @BoydenGrayAssoc You know who agrees? The NIH. I’m a little surprised this link still works. https://t.co/WPHSyOLXRE
@JohnsonNavanR @jimmy_dore Do some research and stop repeating lies. https://t.co/x6umNH6pK3
RT @jimmy_dore: @Rachelanthecity Here’s another study that wasn’t funded by big pharma: https://t.co/5FBVTty3cT https://t.co/EbcpCKoB4g
RT @jimmy_dore: @Rachelanthecity Here’s another study that wasn’t funded by big pharma: https://t.co/5FBVTty3cT https://t.co/EbcpCKoB4g
RT @DonnaAncestor: @hollyhazdabluez @catturd2 You might want to read more peer reviewed articles or get an updated nursing 101 book. https:…
@Rachelanthecity Here’s another study that wasn’t funded by big pharma: https://t.co/5FBVTty3cT https://t.co/EbcpCKoB4g
@Rachelanthecity @jimmy_dore Sure. There was more than enough evidence of efficacy to suggest a positive signal and allow it to be prescribed. Worst case it did nothing. Instead there was a coordinated smear campaign. Coincidentally, it's dirt cheap. 🤔 ht
RT @DonnaAncestor: @hollyhazdabluez @catturd2 You might want to read more peer reviewed articles or get an updated nursing 101 book. https:…
@hollyhazdabluez @catturd2 You might want to read more peer reviewed articles or get an updated nursing 101 book. https://t.co/PdIJir1H19 https://t.co/k4WLHXtxIS https://t.co/kXRnqdSe3O https://t.co/RbaOpFyNYl https://t.co/zWxpqJEnO5 https://t.co/gCU2
@jessericeevans get ivermectin. pharma has been hiding its effectiveness. don't fall for the gov bs. they want your money and fear, not your wellbeing. https://t.co/Wbh5sAJUEt https://t.co/WDWGlnnZgK https://t.co/GHLTEX4YGP
Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines - PMC @JoeTalkShow https://t.co/ZYN8soSWhy
@_jedisf @DavidDorrell3 @d_a_keldsen @thereal_truther @BrandyZadrozny And another one: https://t.co/rCFdrbFfJc
@Scott_755 @Oth3rPabl0 And it is just as easy to find multiple articles and meta analysis that shows ivermectin was helpful. Less propaganda though. https://t.co/ACjeRK9AJS https://t.co/jBccIHghzY https://t.co/V2Q8TxMKGn https://t.co/wf1Jh6jA3d http
@LeftSideStrong5 @karasoth @EdKrassen @Timcast Here is the actual findings from the NIH. The liberal and Dr fauci bible. It is directly from the NIH government website. They answers are in black and white on our government web page. https://t.co/f8YcZmhaE
@HansPeterDietz @MdBreathe NIH disagrees https://t.co/f8YcZmhaEj
@AlBowers1 @MdBreathe How about the official government stance. Here is the NIH report on it. Dr Fauci's and the Liberals Bible. They had to report it, but didn't want you to see it. This is from the official government website. Majorly damning. https:/
@tommysantos14 @EdKrassen @Timcast You are absolutely incorrect. It was ineffective as a treatment for covid. As a prophylaxis beforehand it was highly effective. Here is the official stance of the NIH now taken from their government website. The Bible to
@EdKrassen @karasoth @Timcast Here is your study. It is now the NIH official stance. Here is the link on their government website. Remember, the NIH is pretty much the Bible to the Liberals and Dr Fauci https://t.co/f8YcZmhaEj
@KathyLehan3 @EdKrassen @Timcast Watch what you are reading. It is mainly ineffective as a treatment. But as a prophylaxis it is very effective. 86% effective. Not just a random study. This is now the NIH official stance. Dr Fauhi's and the Liberals Bible