↓ Skip to main content

Wolters Kluwer

Classification of Surgical Complications

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, August 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
8 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
patent
4 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
4841 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Classification of Surgical Complications
Published in
Annals of Surgery, August 2004
DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Dindo, Nicolas Demartines, Pierre-Alain Clavien

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,841 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Denmark 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Other 12 <1%
Unknown 4794 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 553 11%
Other 499 10%
Student > Master 420 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 420 9%
Student > Postgraduate 413 9%
Other 1119 23%
Unknown 1417 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2647 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 93 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 <1%
Engineering 45 <1%
Other 242 5%
Unknown 1707 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2024.
All research outputs
#572,287
of 26,539,834 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#258
of 9,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#483
of 62,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,539,834 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.