↓ Skip to main content

Wolters Kluwer

Article Metrics

Biological Clock Key to Reducing Heart Damage From Radiation

Overview of attention for article published in Oncology times, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Biological Clock Key to Reducing Heart Damage From Radiation
Published in
Oncology times, February 2020
DOI 10.1097/01.cot.0000654744.98288.d9

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#11,199,297
of 17,882,239 outputs
Outputs from Oncology times
#2,667
of 3,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,714
of 341,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncology times
#95
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,882,239 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,751 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.