↓ Skip to main content

Wolters Kluwer

Article Metrics

A Perspective on the Evidence Regarding Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Surveillance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient Safety, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
A Perspective on the Evidence Regarding Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Surveillance
Published in
Journal of Patient Safety, September 2012
DOI 10.1097/pts.0b013e3182627b89
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin Kavanagh, Said Abusalem, Daniel M. Saman

Abstract

Two prominent studies have been used by policy makers to prevent the enactment of standards of care regarding active surveillance of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospital settings. In this brief review and perspective of those studies, we contend that both studies have serious limitations (i.e., the intervention group was not given optimal intervention) that may not have been scrutinized by many policy makers, health officials, and other researchers. These studies seem to have had a disproportionate impact on health-care policy despite their limitations. Furthermore, health-care policy and treatment standards need to reflect the preponderance of evidence with appropriate weight given to research studies based on their strengths and limitations. Only then can treatment standards that are effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus be adopted or refuted.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 44%
Social Sciences 2 13%
Psychology 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 3 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2017.
All research outputs
#1,917,215
of 13,600,257 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient Safety
#128
of 700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,120
of 126,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient Safety
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,600,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.