The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Posterior capsule management in congenital cataract surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.036 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abhay R. Vasavada, Mamidipudi R. Praveen, Marie-José Tassignon, Sajani K. Shah, Vaishali A. Vasavada, Viraj A. Vasavada, Jan Van Looveren, Ilse De Veuster, Rupal H. Trivedi |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 21% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 59% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
#4,836,328
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
#364
of 3,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,797
of 190,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.