↓ Skip to main content

Wolters Kluwer

Readiness of US General Surgery Residents for Independent Practice

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
twitter
214 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
Title
Readiness of US General Surgery Residents for Independent Practice
Published in
Annals of Surgery, October 2017
DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000002414
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian C. George, Jordan D. Bohnen, Reed G. Williams, Shari L. Meyerson, Mary C. Schuller, Michael J. Clark, Andreas H. Meier, Laura Torbeck, Samuel P. Mandell, John T. Mullen, Douglas S. Smink, Rebecca E. Scully, Jeffrey G. Chipman, Edward D. Auyang, Kyla P. Terhune, Paul E. Wise, Jennifer N. Choi, Eugene F. Foley, Justin B. Dimick, Michael A. Choti, Nathaniel J. Soper, Keith D. Lillemoe, Joseph B. Zwischenberger, Gary L. Dunnington, Debra A. DaRosa, Jonathan P. Fryer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 214 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 204 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 22 11%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 7%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Other 48 24%
Unknown 70 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 43%
Engineering 7 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 79 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 228. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#170,367
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#64
of 9,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,558
of 332,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#1
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.