↓ Skip to main content

Wolters Kluwer

In Vivo Dark-Field Radiography for Early Diagnosis and Staging of Pulmonary Emphysema

Overview of attention for article published in Investigative Radiology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
In Vivo Dark-Field Radiography for Early Diagnosis and Staging of Pulmonary Emphysema
Published in
Investigative Radiology, July 2015
DOI 10.1097/rli.0000000000000147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharina Hellbach, Andre Yaroshenko, Felix G. Meinel, Ali Ö. Yildirim, Thomas M. Conlon, Martin Bech, Mark Mueller, Astrid Velroyen, Mike Notohamiprodjo, Fabian Bamberg, Sigrid Auweter, Maximilian Reiser, Oliver Eickelberg, Franz Pfeiffer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Student > Master 15 20%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 28 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 20%
Engineering 7 9%
Computer Science 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2015.
All research outputs
#4,572,992
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Investigative Radiology
#114
of 2,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,835
of 277,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigative Radiology
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.