The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Update and review of central retinal vein occlusion
|
---|---|
Published in |
Current opinion in ophthalmology, May 2011
|
DOI | 10.1097/icu.0b013e3283459737 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nikolas JS London, Gary Brown |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 63 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 23% |
Other | 9 | 14% |
Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Other | 13 | 20% |
Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 50% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 17 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Current opinion in ophthalmology
#307
of 1,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,384
of 121,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current opinion in ophthalmology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,221 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.