↓ Skip to main content

Wolters Kluwer

Update and review of central retinal vein occlusion

Overview of attention for article published in Current opinion in ophthalmology, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Update and review of central retinal vein occlusion
Published in
Current opinion in ophthalmology, May 2011
DOI 10.1097/icu.0b013e3283459737
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikolas JS London, Gary Brown

Timeline
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 23%
Other 9 14%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Unspecified 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 17 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Current opinion in ophthalmology
#307
of 1,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,384
of 121,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current opinion in ophthalmology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,221 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.