↓ Skip to main content

Wolters Kluwer

Descemetorhexis Without Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus DMEK for Treatment of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

Overview of attention for article published in Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Descemetorhexis Without Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus DMEK for Treatment of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy
Published in
Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease, September 2018
DOI 10.1097/ico.0000000000001742
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marshall J Huang, Steven Kane, Deepinder K Dhaliwal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 57%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,175,718
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease
#1,189
of 3,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,444
of 348,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease
#12
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,281 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.