Yes, key is EARLY treatment, which we’ve been told from early on, and not Ivermectin ALONE.
RT @NotWoke33: @NEJM https://t.co/SdqhZ3Ky8H a number of studies pertaining to Ivermectin & COVID https://t.co/S1RiSSEyXs NIH study of Iver…
RT @PeggyLewerenz1: @DrEricDing Then explain this on the NIH website: https://t.co/2FktgRp14t
@gred_vet @democracynow https://t.co/6S85MUXIco A systematic review of 15 trials showing that it reduced mortality and severity of disease. You can also pull pull those 15 trials and check them individually. There were more studies coming out of India and
@NEJM Ivermectin has exhibited antiviral activity against a wide range of RNA and some DNA viruses, for example, Zika, dengue, yellow fever, and others. These quotes from: https://t.co/4kOYUrl4q7
@EricRWeinstein Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guideline https://t.co/OepQ0ygW4m
@Nomad04413474 @AnikaRonnie2005 @LadyNoPantsIRL @NEJM Please feel free to review. All Peer-reviewed: https://t.co/bKFz95c4j2 https://t.co/eDECQdhJ7O https://t.co/s9Odsx4Ujt https://t.co/mexGVgpeGX
@globalnews Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 https://t.co/CoihTutiFB
@Kind_Geek @JonathanRStone @YallRCrazy @therecount I suppose the nih is wrong. https://t.co/s56Pve5NfD
@DrEricDing Then explain this on the NIH website: https://t.co/2FktgRp14t
@gatec1 @heywardwhynot2 @CTVNews Those were truncated biased clinical studies. Its also listed in the American journal if therapeutics as an advancement in treatment. This is a peer reviewed meta analysis of 15 studies and the results are clear. It works.
RT @BUpholsterer: @TwitterMoments So this meta-analysis By Dr. Tess Lawrie, peer reviewed and published has no clinical value. Right. And t…
RT @NotWoke33: @NEJM https://t.co/SdqhZ3Ky8H a number of studies pertaining to Ivermectin & COVID https://t.co/S1RiSSEyXs NIH study of Iver…
@PharmaBlue @FoxPharmD So again- everyone involved in THIS- is a liar? https://t.co/bh4E4RncvR
@nytimes It does. https://t.co/AHpe09qOD2
@hfernando_urol @NEJM Get informed https://t.co/YGCh8NsiUE
@PharmaBlue @chrismartenson I’m guessing this is all lies then Junior? https://t.co/bh4E4RncvR
@science_ffs @CharaStone6 @EricTopol @NEJM No. Its shit. Lie harder https://t.co/AHpe09qOD2
Hay que leer las noticias al revés, esto es una promoción de las va q nas disfrazado de ciencia. Aquí otro estudio que dice exactamente lo contrario: https://t.co/tkNhpPyfrK
RT @0xGospel: For anyone reading any new nonsense about ivermect*n not working (or still thinks it’s horse paste) - feel free to read some…
@nytimes So NIH.... The findings indicate with moderate certainty that ivermectin treatment in COVID-19 provides a significant survival benefit. https://t.co/BhhZEZ1bIm
@TwitterMoments So this meta-analysis By Dr. Tess Lawrie, peer reviewed and published has no clinical value. Right. And this has been determined how? Total b.s. https://t.co/eurpLc5MVe
@Gary35218119 15 trials stated it prevents death.. https://t.co/p4qarGbboy
@NEJM https://t.co/SdqhZ3Ky8H a number of studies pertaining to Ivermectin & COVID https://t.co/S1RiSSEyXs NIH study of Ivermectin
“Conclusions: Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin.” https://t.co/5VfArXJGJP
@barochoc @hfernando_urol @NEJM Correct
@hfernando_urol @NEJM What about this study
@NEJM What about this study
Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19... : American Journal of Therapeutics https://t.co/5y5jpqAWyB
@bhj54 @HuffPost There have been many studies of the use of Ivermectin for covid. here is one that summarizes 15 of them. Your claim only shows your ignorance. https://t.co/e2ainTYxcy
@WIWRONGWU @Hashgraphian @nytimes You didn't click that second link. "Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin (average risk ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.73; n = 2438; I2 = 49%; modera
@DenverChannel In other news, a study published on NIH, which found it did help! https://t.co/D7eeTAWj8W https://t.co/dVgTJFtFuf
@Jareliini @LindenAki Tai sit se auttaa https://t.co/VsHRUp1rFa
@GlassGalahs @pleb_l0rd @EricTopol @NEJM Little to no evidence? https://t.co/aN4kgoNF7D https://t.co/Fc67jAq5YO
RT @MatildaTexas: @Druggist1982 @MdBreathe @HEB Try to listen to your own advice - here are a few. https://t.co/Txq6YU7nIg
@alex_gorell @nytimes “ ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%–91%).”. https://t.co/MPLbi1i1Ry
@nytimes So now you are saying that the NIH Lies. Turning on one of your own? “ ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%–91%).”. https://t.co/MPLbi1i1Ry
RT @MatildaTexas: @Druggist1982 @MdBreathe @HEB Try to listen to your own advice - here are a few. https://t.co/Txq6YU7nIg
@Druggist1982 @MdBreathe @HEB Try to listen to your own advice - here are a few. https://t.co/Txq6YU7nIg
@EricTopol @NEJM https://t.co/OQijB0VoJb Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease.
@Shadowmn50 Tell that to your precious “experts” over at the NIH 😇 People have been taking human doses of ivermectin for many years. The science isn’t on your side, #BigPharma would lose so much money if they actually told the truth. 👌🏽 https://t.co/X5H
@thehill https://t.co/EhS5kr98Xc https://t.co/MSPRYEyJzY two of many on the nih website. Why do conflicting?
RT @DavidLeyonhjelm: @smh @stuartlayt Why is this trial definitive when 15 earlier trials came to a different conclusion? https://t.co/Ish…
@Martin_Moder @B_ernhard Und weils - laut Moder - ja so "ungeeignet" ist, gibts dazu alleine in dieser Metaanalyse 144 zitierte Studien zum Thema : "In addition to its antiparasitic activity, Ivermectin has been noted to have remarkable antiviral and anti-
@EricTopol @NEJM Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guideline https://t.co/OepQ0ygW4m
@EricTopol Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guideline https://t.co/OepQ0ygW4m
@nytimes Once more, with feeling... https://t.co/s0inUrrTcS
@tedlieu @joncoopertweets https://t.co/6hvmeZJw4d Do you guys ever bother to do any research, or are you just knee jerk liberals? Rhetorical question,
@GregDore2 Hmm you are a fwit https://t.co/vkFHP02Dtu
@HistoricalNoOne @JReinerMD 1 google search: https://t.co/FY6xpShKUw
@ThatMorph @nytimes No need for that..https://t.co/p4qarGbboy
@bananaplatypus @nytimes It does...https://t.co/p4qarGbboy
@nytimes Not according to this. It reduced the risk of death...https://t.co/p4qarGbboy
RT @marc_g_wathelet: @seraphus7 @El_Dic_TatoR Il y en a 81 aujourd'hui, cette vidéo date d'avril 2021. Quelques méta-analyses de ces études…
@verity_france Etudes sur l'ivermectine 83% d'efficacité On peut dire que se sont des assasins Avec une gestion de la pandemie comme ca https://t.co/eWKsyrWdi9
RT @marc_g_wathelet: @seraphus7 @El_Dic_TatoR Il y en a 81 aujourd'hui, cette vidéo date d'avril 2021. Quelques méta-analyses de ces études…
@brisbanetimes That's weird, according to the https://t.co/J1zJTCTuMU it's says something totally different 🤷 https://t.co/Z5IPcU3BFT https://t.co/UgLwclynhp
@VictorianCHO Umm … please tells us why you’re ignoring this https://t.co/ahI1WKYRwD
@seraphus7 @El_Dic_TatoR Il y en a 81 aujourd'hui, cette vidéo date d'avril 2021. Quelques méta-analyses de ces études : https://t.co/hcQ7XUNtq2 https://t.co/2GyAQCgXzq https://t.co/dG9UoWaLkX https://t.co/NCUIKo0UU8 https://t.co/WWlaGdYGPn