@Kamots_A @Timcast https://t.co/PzPGgZeiCU. No, there was evidence but it’s potentially harmful. Just like having dead flesh inside you is for women. The real problem was being politically correct mattered more to the administration
@KingKalaih @Timcast https://t.co/PzPGgZeiCU. No, there was evidence but it’s potentially harmful. Just like having dead flesh inside you is for women.
@EWoodhouse7 @PatriotSkyrific What's unethical is "Dr" Fauci's own NIH confirming (in several trials) that IVERMECTIN worked, and worked well! Here's just a portion of the truth (attached conclusion to make it easy on democratic sheep) - https://t.co/hLN0
@dumbfuck_tweets you keep saying it is not effective and yet there are smarter people than you saying it is, an example: "large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible ... using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to
@Michell11629154 @EricMMatheny You are incorrect again - you need to remove yourself from the bubble of information you are fed- https://t.co/iyHyjetpX2
@circlegay420 @hradzka Check your data mate. A number of studies have shown that human levels of ivermectin does aid in treatment for the Wuhan China Coronavirus. https://t.co/bE1P8m3z4I
@physics_up @seanmdav @JesseKellyDC Oh, really? https://t.co/8M5D1ZtBhx
@delton @seanmdav Like this? https://t.co/8M5D1ZtBhx
🧵 Joe Rogan announced on 9/1/21 that he had covid and was prescribed ivermectin as treatment. In August the same year, the American Journal of Therapeutics printed a clinical finding that ivermectin reduced hospitalization by 86% in covid patients.... htt
@LorraineHirsch @YardleyShooting When I was talking about cell lines I wasn't talking avoid covid jabs. According to 15 trials ivermectin works..https://t.co/p4qarGbboy
@JohnPaceWrites @MelissainJax @FlaDems @kilmeade @newsmax Please... our gov't wanted to give Pfizer 75 years to hide their vaccine data to shield them from liability. That's about 3 generations, yes? The WHOLE time Fauci's own NIH knew Ivermectin worked!
@mozdef_ckamau @matteyas @HDelench @MattH_4America Ooh, here we go: https://t.co/4kePksxOB8 Right after the conclusion is a big ERRATUM stating data was inaccurate and the findings are invalidated. I'm shocked!!!!!!!! Lmao.
@motherboard You’re a liar. ivermectin was a COMPLETE success in treating covid. https://t.co/33emYfdHem
@Deetrain90 @pickernackles @snarkyrobot @homelesspolster @DefiantLs Actual science says you are wrong https://t.co/kCe2icsRLK https://t.co/fkMhn2Mwuc
@ragusajr158 @Alicauni1 @DefiantLs Try real science covidiot! https://t.co/kCe2icsRLK https://t.co/Gehk6bogkx
@motherboard That's not what the NIH says... https://t.co/h8sm3bOhEE
@SandBlastr09 @Cubanigar @APMC1985 @phares_tim @DrewHolden360 Are we just posting research that we like? This study says, “Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin.” https://t.co/QWZ0yjUdmH
RT @spatton78: @Bowl_of_Worcel @SebGorka Nothing does. Not even the shot. But it has been proven that ivermectin is effective in treating t…
@Bowl_of_Worcel @SebGorka Nothing does. Not even the shot. But it has been proven that ivermectin is effective in treating the severity of the symptoms. https://t.co/rXcPXMyJBF
@Austimo78 @WaffenWaffel @motherboard You support chopping off your genitals and trying to convert yourself to the opposite sex. Try reading, autismo. https://t.co/54muunWEk1
@twapestriesbro @elonmusk You see: here is a study, https://t.co/WIOQsXUrR4
@kay_mkgrimes321 @emeriticus https://t.co/5fJNckZ4Oc Are you a scientist Kay?
@boognietzsche @OlivePufa @BretWeinstein Who told you that? Have you read the literature ?? https://t.co/dsmLPcWX9a https://t.co/ePnqhd5l0Y
@scadjunker @Troy_Tim @motherboard And yet... https://t.co/G7auQuILL8
@twapestriesbro @elonmusk 5 minutes on Google and you already look like a clown : https://t.co/4ra0Teqs5g
@sillyhaha71 @Cernovich You are not a real doctor. Stop this dangerous misinformation piece; https://t.co/4ra0Teqs5g
Have fun, son. https://t.co/Zwx3gFP4k2 https://t.co/1SSSlIHJq2
@motherboard You think Vice should be trusted over the NCBI? https://t.co/DKoCH0pwFD
@VoxRogamus @MagickFoozle @DefiantLs @danny_j_g Yawn, stop misinforming https://t.co/4ra0Teqs5g
@keithvandiver3 @TSLA4orphans @JackPosobiec Actually no. https://t.co/GCeYtN3e2R
@DMACalvert @sandflea711 @scottcowen1 @FredH85 @motherboard Under conclusion. There are many. The mainstream media wants us to believe only a horse dewormer https://t.co/LqOBFEq2qL
@SeeReason @ddssff @MrAndyNgo It's ok to be wrong, you should be used to it by now. https://t.co/FJW9ToVOui
RT @currerbell87: @DefiantLs For every person who's still saying "iTs hORsE deWoRmER," please read the NIH study on the effects of IVM on C…
@VaccinesAndMask @DefiantLs Why does Fauci's website say it does? https://t.co/Ht1fB2uBtx
@seanmdav @nedryun #ivermectin and #COVID19. Here it is, right off of the US Gov’t website, NIH, of which Fauci is a part: Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin https://t.co/5YQPuqGYHj
@OfficialBraelin @seanmdav @Shem_Infinite Wrong comrade. #ivermectin and #COVID19. Here it is, right off of the US Gov’t website, NIH, of which Fauci is a part: Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no iver
@motherboard Vice has probably killed people. https://t.co/jQz6GT8b8z
@fireater02 @Mat46758009 @Azathot17 @1968Hughesinc @Timcast You were saying? https://t.co/f52epK4MED
@HXFZHG @WaffenWaffel @motherboard Yes it does https://t.co/LQLaKI8n0q
@Azathot17 @Woodard1Shane @Timcast https://t.co/f52epK4MED If you refuse to believe peer reviewed science that’s up to you but stating there is no objective proof that it works just makes you look either dishonest or stupid.
@DefiantLs For every person who's still saying "iTs hORsE deWoRmER," please read the NIH study on the effects of IVM on COVID: Hint: turns out, it did lower death rates. https://t.co/h8sm3bOhEE
@BasedTomas @boxlater @ragusajr158 That's not what the NIH says. Studies showed that IVM reduced symptoms and death rates lowered. Go to the source, the Media and government officials lied. https://t.co/h8sm3bOhEE
@motherboard You were saying? https://t.co/4Z79LeBCbA
@Azathot17 @1968Hughesinc @Timcast What was that? https://t.co/0nteQq7vs9
@DoctorGusDVM @CHenson38876707 @UnfairPaul @Timcast Depends if you just rely on google to feed you approved sites by the algorithm. Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. https://t.co/EWgf
@motherboard Reporting this Tweet as "misinformation". https://t.co/6uIXarbpdh
@motherboard The difference is Ivermectin does work. https://t.co/FMB1M5quvb Go sit down,
@motherboard Educate yourself, knucklehead. https://t.co/7JeCUHBIXj
@motherboard But but .. Fauci's own website say.. it works.https://t.co/mkhuZggZW8
@motherboard So is the NIH classed as a conspiracy theorist? According to 15 trials ivermextin works and prevents death. https://t.co/p4qarGbboy
@FranklinLynam It doesn't treat COVID? Who told you that? https://t.co/Sag2NXTSC5
@formal_llama @hexrain1 @DrewHolden360 Lack of FDA Approval does not mean it does not treat COVID. https://t.co/t82pRG8ER9 https://t.co/Y2z0wizNV7
@JohnM53093509 @MattH_4America Read the conclusions, Dr. https://t.co/NjNquQnipK
@420sexhaver @Jccalmond2 @The_Virgo_801 @PitDocX @MattH_4America Take a breather from spewing nonsense for a minute and read the conclusions. https://t.co/NjNquQnipK
@DougWalsh72 @MattH_4America Read the conclusions, Dr. https://t.co/NjNquQnipK
@r_sotojr @MattH_4America Conclusions: Moderate-certainty evidence finds large reductions in COVID19 deaths possible using ivermectin use may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The safety and low cost suggest ivermectin likely to have a signific
@Bluesysun63 @MattH_4America There are over 50 peer reviewed studies on the effectiveness of Ivermectin. It’s off patent so there is no money to be made in it. Here ya go, just one of many: https://t.co/a2a9lXOm1l
@DougWalsh72 @MattH_4America Straight from nih website smarty https://t.co/htGYxjY0Ro
@HDelench @MattH_4America Try again, champ! https://t.co/QClLAvj9R6
@John28500101 @UScopus I found loads of pro-IVM studies. But I was never very ill. I woke up feeling like I'd recently been ill & then spent the next 2 weeks clearing it. Every day was "I'll be clear tomorrow" but it lingered annoyingly. Like many cold
@MrsGonzales20 Here's my reading pack. It's not up to date, because I stopped collecting when the evidence for plenty of treatments became overwhelming & pointless trying to keep up. Many ways to treat it. https://t.co/vP7NjckxRc keeps refining his pro
@notaslave2fear @annaworonko79 find a doctor that will prescribe ivermectin to treat covid. It may also cure the flu. It's safe and effective and cheap. https://t.co/c3uHs6tyyf
@mjtimber2 @PierreKory This published peer reviewed meta analysis last year validated studies already done showing positive results. FDA decided to cherry pick 1 out of 36 to question, and they NEVER contacted the authors for clarification, then lied about
@HamiltonWaverly Educate yourself. Stop helping big a Pharma disinformation. https://t.co/2mE1vRDMcL
@InvisibleStann @DouglasFanson @Sanchez_MMA @TypeACommentary @scrowder @elonmusk Now you're spreading disinformation. https://t.co/dPLqeLKPtf
@Sanchez_MMA @DouglasFanson @TypeACommentary @scrowder @elonmusk You obviously don't do any research before you make uninformed claims. https://t.co/dPLqeLKPtf
@CanAm_Indy @TulsiGabbard And what if it turns out ivermectin DOES help treat COVID, but because government declares it ‘disinformation,’ it isn’t used to treat patients who could benefit from it? Should they be punished for their unwillingness to try it?