@MissIgraine @glenpyle @IsZomg https://t.co/1kN4VGfzP9

@dr_jon_l This Meta-analysis from American Journal of Therapeutics says it works. Not arguing. Looking for answers. https://t.co/V93j2U2sqO

@NamelessGhoulTX @Covid19Critical @FreeWCH Meta-analysis from The American Journal of Therapeutics says it works https://t.co/V93j2U2sqO

@AlastairMcA30 @Covid19Critical @FreeWCH Hmm, 🤔 Meta analysis from the American Journal of Therapeutics https://t.co/V93j2U2sqO

@AlastairMcA30 This Meta-analysis from the American Journal of Therapeutics says it does work. I'm getting conflicting information. https://t.co/V93j2U2sqO

@COERSO_VAXXER @AlastairMcA30 https://t.co/62os9ONaoH

RT @AJ32800278: @FreeWCH Dr. Tess Lawrie, a WHO expert in analysis of medical evidence, shows we have more than evidence for Ivermectin use…

@HaHaGentherapie @mandooow1 @maria_vansant Ga de data dan eens bestuderen. Geloven doe je maar in de kerk hoor. Hcq: https://t.co/VkAl9aeaPn https://t.co/53XAohoj1r Ivermectine: https://t.co/mQayuOj0iz https://t.co/1g1szEZgHN

RT @BellaDodds: @c_plushie @RobertKennedyJr @P_McCulloughMD @PierreKory @DrHarveyRisch @NassMeryl "Moderate-certainty evidence finds that l…

@c_plushie @RobertKennedyJr @P_McCulloughMD @PierreKory @DrHarveyRisch @NassMeryl "Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers pr

@FrackHazReveal @VivekGRamaswamy 🤷🏾‍♀️ https://t.co/gyoXsYuQHp

@BarbYohn1 @MsNoLaJane @TheChiefNerd @RobertKennedyJr https://t.co/yhCv87eZw4

@laffmotron @TheChiefNerd @RobertKennedyJr https://t.co/0kX5GlmBZe

RT @DrDrstoller: @LizaMaria5D @unhealthytruth @ItsMichaelRay1 there are many studies... not just from this year: https://t.co/3J3yitYmAt

@thisisnothappen @bhbunny_ben https://t.co/oQNuI6g4WY

@LizaMaria5D @unhealthytruth @ItsMichaelRay1 there are many studies... not just from this year: https://t.co/3J3yitYmAt

@TheChiefNerd @RobertKennedyJr Tess Lawrie's meta analysis https://t.co/xX4d34mrsW

RT @justjodes68: @CamLangton @CKellyUAP Look at the work of Dr tess lawrie. https://t.co/JcTFRcDAgi

@ObamaSaidWhat1 @ChuckCallesto This one is a real research paper might be hard for you to understand - https://t.co/3LCcF0DvyD

@JohnHan17112435 @KrazyLoco4 @RobSchneider https://t.co/31KIrLXIMB https://t.co/1Hd2D4FPWh

@CamLangton @CKellyUAP Look at the work of Dr tess lawrie. https://t.co/JcTFRcDAgi

@fioletovakoshka https://t.co/Dyu6n5TUep

RT @OffCyndisc: Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19... : American Journal of Therapeutics https://t.co/nAWssYVJtu

@bellmardesigns @krassenstein @Inventitnow To be fair to you, it only says "moderate-certainty" so more research is needed, but that's pretty good for a guess from...what did you say? I believe you said something along the lines of taking advice from a pha

@Creativologist @NikkiPreston107 There has been enough test in the US. By individuals. The reason IVM was squashed is there’s no money in it. $0.20 a pill vs $40 a shot. Scroll down to conclusion https://t.co/R0wMcfoLkm

@holgerjh @GeoffreyPlitt @shanley_dennis @ChuckCallesto How about this??? "Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressi

@cescopetrillo @BowTiedDetektiv @sissyroxx https://t.co/x6umNH6pK3

@iainz1 @zaptrapped @sissyroxx Give this a read. I highly doubt you will... https://t.co/x6umNH6pK3

@sergeant_1st @Derek74213588 @mortyshallman @sissyroxx https://t.co/x6umNH6pK3

@nephx09 @mortyshallman @sissyroxx https://t.co/x6umNH6pK3

RT @OffCyndisc: Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19... : American Journal of Therapeutics https://t.co/nAWssYVJtu

RT @TruthCampaigns: This medicine didn’t need to be repurposed for treatments of patients sick with #Covid19 it was already used as an #an…

@Madseno42 @billscher @DAaronovitch https://t.co/fesgnogXBy

This medicine didn’t need to be repurposed for treatments of patients sick with #Covid19 it was already used as an #antiviral & anthelmintic in Human & animal #Medicine #Covid #Pandemic #Ivermectin #MedTwitter what Big pharma did was prevent #hea

RT @JosephH89964200: @cappsie @CoryRove @JSAHolmes @frugalsues @RTheatheist @familysherrod @pawley_robert @Chris_F_Carson @LWSmith15 @ADevo…

Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19... : American Journal of Therapeutics https://t.co/nAWssYVJtu

@leslibless Ivermectin works. https://t.co/JkuUjdYVaN

@birdieswan @leslibless It works. https://t.co/JkuUjdYVaN

RT @ThomasSayre13: @djoflowerpower @RonFilipkowski @RcRegalstarfire Ivermectin users fare best, it seems. "ivermectin prophylaxis reduced…

RT @kennytexas: @MdBreathe @DavidWolfe @RobertApter1 @drpaulmarik1 @BoydenGrayAssoc You know who agrees? The NIH. I’m a little surprised th…

Interesting study from the NIH.... https://t.co/M5ddRzTKpz

@djoflowerpower @RonFilipkowski @RcRegalstarfire Ivermectin users fare best, it seems. "ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%–91%)" https://t.co/DgiPP3q05L

RT @jimmy_dore: @Rachelanthecity Here’s another study that wasn’t funded by big pharma: https://t.co/5FBVTty3cT https://t.co/EbcpCKoB4g

@Woooeee3 @RealPotatus @djoflowerpower @RonFilipkowski @RcRegalstarfire Dr. Tess Lawrie, a WHO expert in analysis of medical evidence, shows we have more than evidence for Ivermectin used for Covid19 with peer-reviewed paper published in American Journal

@drkwarlord https://t.co/xQdfOcLtRR

@backell @SininStyle @burnsurvior @ChuckCallesto @drzoegrey It’s on the WHO list of essential medicines. https://t.co/Fy3zEPXCPE ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86%

@ChuckCallesto On the NIH website: https://t.co/Fy3zEPX506 ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86%

@dehavengl @Sassafrass_84 @quickwitter @WalshFreedom https://t.co/JMke5LVRCd

@ViewLiberty @JJeff4t @ChuckCallesto Highly encourage you to check out this article from the NIH: https://t.co/tbAPk9oPeb If you don't have the time to read the whole thing, the conclusion gives you enough to at least suggest that ivermectin helps with mo

@BlueGreenOrion @1stForaReason @jimmy_dore https://t.co/x6umNH6pK3

@ChodeMonchu @DavidWolfe https://t.co/O7vS1SKCfC

@MaxieCricket @DavidWolfe https://t.co/O7vS1SKCfC

@Arkthugal @DavidWolfe https://t.co/O7vS1SKCfC

RT @jimmy_dore: @Rachelanthecity Here’s another study that wasn’t funded by big pharma: https://t.co/5FBVTty3cT https://t.co/EbcpCKoB4g

RT @jimmy_dore: @Rachelanthecity Here’s another study that wasn’t funded by big pharma: https://t.co/5FBVTty3cT https://t.co/EbcpCKoB4g

RT @jimmy_dore: @Rachelanthecity Here’s another study that wasn’t funded by big pharma: https://t.co/5FBVTty3cT https://t.co/EbcpCKoB4g

RT @jimmy_dore: @Rachelanthecity Here’s another study that wasn’t funded by big pharma: https://t.co/5FBVTty3cT https://t.co/EbcpCKoB4g

@BangeWilliam @jimmy_dore @klpjustice1 No thats libs. Saw a vid of a dude use a cup to collect horse piss then drink it. Got some reading for you tho https://t.co/x6umNH6pK3

RT @jimmy_dore: @Rachelanthecity Here’s another study that wasn’t funded by big pharma: https://t.co/5FBVTty3cT https://t.co/EbcpCKoB4g

@MdBreathe @DavidWolfe @RobertApter1 @drpaulmarik1 @BoydenGrayAssoc You know who agrees? The NIH. I’m a little surprised this link still works. https://t.co/WPHSyOLXRE

@LoudChris @jimmy_dore https://t.co/x6umNH6pK3

@JohnsonNavanR @jimmy_dore Do some research and stop repeating lies. https://t.co/x6umNH6pK3

RT @jimmy_dore: @Rachelanthecity Here’s another study that wasn’t funded by big pharma: https://t.co/5FBVTty3cT https://t.co/EbcpCKoB4g

RT @jimmy_dore: @Rachelanthecity Here’s another study that wasn’t funded by big pharma: https://t.co/5FBVTty3cT https://t.co/EbcpCKoB4g

RT @DonnaAncestor: @hollyhazdabluez @catturd2 You might want to read more peer reviewed articles or get an updated nursing 101 book. https:…

@Rachelanthecity Here’s another study that wasn’t funded by big pharma: https://t.co/5FBVTty3cT https://t.co/EbcpCKoB4g

@Rachelanthecity @jimmy_dore Sure. There was more than enough evidence of efficacy to suggest a positive signal and allow it to be prescribed. Worst case it did nothing. Instead there was a coordinated smear campaign. Coincidentally, it's dirt cheap. 🤔 ht

RT @DonnaAncestor: @hollyhazdabluez @catturd2 You might want to read more peer reviewed articles or get an updated nursing 101 book. https:…

@hollyhazdabluez @catturd2 You might want to read more peer reviewed articles or get an updated nursing 101 book. https://t.co/PdIJir1H19 https://t.co/k4WLHXtxIS https://t.co/kXRnqdSe3O https://t.co/RbaOpFyNYl https://t.co/zWxpqJEnO5 https://t.co/gCU2

@mackie4567 @JudyMaxB9632935 @Jrunk_af @JustinTrudeau https://t.co/PfUKI1OK5e

@jessericeevans get ivermectin. pharma has been hiding its effectiveness. don't fall for the gov bs. they want your money and fear, not your wellbeing. https://t.co/Wbh5sAJUEt https://t.co/WDWGlnnZgK https://t.co/GHLTEX4YGP

Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines - PMC ⁦@JoeTalkShow⁩ https://t.co/ZYN8soSWhy

RT @JosephH89964200: @cappsie @CoryRove @JSAHolmes @frugalsues @RTheatheist @familysherrod @pawley_robert @Chris_F_Carson @LWSmith15 @ADevo…

@_jedisf @DavidDorrell3 @d_a_keldsen @thereal_truther @BrandyZadrozny And another one: https://t.co/rCFdrbFfJc

RT @Zone3Garden: @Scott_755 @Oth3rPabl0 And it is just as easy to find multiple articles and meta analysis that shows ivermectin was helpf…

@Scott_755 @Oth3rPabl0 And it is just as easy to find multiple articles and meta analysis that shows ivermectin was helpful. Less propaganda though. https://t.co/ACjeRK9AJS https://t.co/jBccIHghzY https://t.co/V2Q8TxMKGn https://t.co/wf1Jh6jA3d http

@finGeorge4 https://t.co/TphDsE4SIq

@judysimpson222 https://t.co/TphDsE4SIq

RT @Michael47460730: @AndrewLazarus4 @ds_abp @NotSoSilentBob1 @DecentFiJC @Billenjoylife @topps1960 @AngryFleas @ValhallaMayan @jackdoranjr…

@hot_and_dead @drtexdi @lindibiachi https://t.co/DI9km20vWy

@CMargaronis @3LeggedAxolotyl @sandibachom @MeidasTouch @upchuck66 @nypost https://t.co/Y35KC9hWW9

@MikeAbb40233773 @AmoralHazard @ASFleischman https://t.co/2RI90Cb9uY

@LeftSideStrong5 @karasoth @EdKrassen @Timcast Here is the actual findings from the NIH. The liberal and Dr fauci bible. It is directly from the NIH government website. They answers are in black and white on our government web page. https://t.co/f8YcZmhaE

@HansPeterDietz @MdBreathe NIH disagrees https://t.co/f8YcZmhaEj

@AlBowers1 @MdBreathe How about the official government stance. Here is the NIH report on it. Dr Fauci's and the Liberals Bible. They had to report it, but didn't want you to see it. This is from the official government website. Majorly damning. https:/

@tommysantos14 @EdKrassen @Timcast You are absolutely incorrect. It was ineffective as a treatment for covid. As a prophylaxis beforehand it was highly effective. Here is the official stance of the NIH now taken from their government website. The Bible to

@EdKrassen @karasoth @Timcast Here is your study. It is now the NIH official stance. Here is the link on their government website. Remember, the NIH is pretty much the Bible to the Liberals and Dr Fauci https://t.co/f8YcZmhaEj

@KathyLehan3 @EdKrassen @Timcast Watch what you are reading. It is mainly ineffective as a treatment. But as a prophylaxis it is very effective. 86% effective. Not just a random study. This is now the NIH official stance. Dr Fauhi's and the Liberals Bible

@IntegralAnswers @EdKrassen @Timcast https://t.co/f8YcZmhaEj

@AbeBresn @EdKrassen @Timcast Here is the research data from the NIH. Liberals and Dr fauci's bible.. . 86% effective... any more questions? https://t.co/f8YcZmhaEj

@RulefollowerM @EdKrassen @Timcast How about this one from the NIH. Liberals and Dr Fauchi's bible. It's pretty damning for the Liberals. https://t.co/f8YcZmhaEj

@HamishWheezy @EdKrassen @Timcast How about the report now from the NIH. Liberals and Dr Fauci's Bible... the Liberals are completely wrong on this one. Read it. It's extremely damning for the Liberals https://t.co/f8YcZmhaEj

The NIH of the United States has finally admitted that Ivermectin is extremely effective as a prophylaxis for Covid-19. 86% effective https://t.co/3cGXty2Htw

@EdKrassen @Timcast On the NIH website: https://t.co/Fy3zEPX506 ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%–91%) No reason not to take it before a vaccine was developed, that’s for sure. It’s on the WHO

@BeauclaireLane @Dpete9Peterson @VP Follow the science honey https://t.co/sDCZnYtBCv

@cappsie @BurdenTheo @MaureenStroud @markmcdougall13 @crabb_vicki @ChrisJohnsonMD @PatriotsDanny @Gish19382 @groin_hammer @andylumm @moy_barry @ADevotedYogi @barryjohnreid21 @TwoCoconutHusks @ghoppe @pawley_robert @mcfunny @Chris_F_Carson @JustPlaying2Win

@EdKrassen @Timcast https://t.co/MBdtuKpljf

RT @JosephH89964200: @cappsie @CoryRove @JSAHolmes @frugalsues @RTheatheist @familysherrod @pawley_robert @Chris_F_Carson @LWSmith15 @ADevo…

@jonathanstea https://t.co/JnBv9sdbbs Just a systematic review & meta-analysis showing ivermectin is effective in Covid-19, and cheap, and safe. Oh, and the "expression of concern" - hilarious attempt at censorship, that if you do 2 minutes of researc

@Truth_in_Number @Sbharris11 @djchicus 🍀 "...ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86%..." And yet is BANNED !!! 👇 https://t.co/40y5vybYED