@ChatSecouriste Tout et n'importe quoi ? https://t.co/TBk5cNRziT
RT @ColinDebunks: @Covid19Critical @PierreKory @shannonjoyradi0 Then we have Bryant, Lawrie et al - expression of concern https://t.co/lhbU…
@Covid19Critical @PierreKory @shannonjoyradi0 Then we have Bryant, Lawrie et al - expression of concern https://t.co/lhbU2d1Lnx
@MarkWendrich @Me_xNL Dit is dan jammer. Dus deze is correct? https://t.co/3W9nbFyK8D
@zap_lock Ivermectin, the cheap effective wonder drug 👍 https://t.co/XPNvsnEVSY
RT @Doctor_I_am_The: Death is worse when you knowingly represent something you know is wrong. You are then a part of that death.
@MarkWendrich @Me_xNL Omdat er zoveel onderzoek is gedaan over de korte en lange termijn gevolgen van studies vindt u dit? Studies spreken elkaar tegen en er een grote studie naar een effect van een goedkoop generiek medicijn? Denkt u dat die artsen die
Hieronder: "Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease." https://t.co/3W9nbFyK8D Echter
Die @volkspartei reitet ein totes Pferd. Eine der meistzitierten Studie a l l e r Zeiten: begutachtete Metastudie mit einem Altimetric score von 26,697, an 8. Stelle von ca. 18 Millionen Studien. Stand Feb. 21. https://t.co/UEYOMTDwR9
RT @Doctor_I_am_The: Death is worse when you knowingly represent something you know is wrong. You are then a part of that death.
RT @RonsRant: https://t.co/GDyuxemWMx @ABridgen @Doctor_I_am_The @RealGeorgeWebb1 Why do we get negativity about this drug? Here is one…
RT @Doctor_I_am_The: Death is worse when you knowingly represent something you know is wrong. You are then a part of that death.
RT @RonsRant: https://t.co/GDyuxemWMx @ABridgen @Doctor_I_am_The @RealGeorgeWebb1 Why do we get negativity about this drug? Here is one…
RT @Doctor_I_am_The: Death is worse when you knowingly represent something you know is wrong. You are then a part of that death.
RT @Doctor_I_am_The: Death is worse when you knowingly represent something you know is wrong. You are then a part of that death.
Death is worse when you knowingly represent something you know is wrong. You are then a part of that death.
https://t.co/GDyuxemWMx @ABridgen @Doctor_I_am_The @RealGeorgeWebb1 Why do we get negativity about this drug? Here is one positive. You see, you can't do worse than dead. Stop it! The negativeity.
@docmartin22 @MdBreathe Is snark supposed to hide the fact that you are absolutely lying? https://t.co/WPHSyOLXRE
@Ben_Hur_Lopes @AnaCarolPecanha Pode crer. Quem te paga para ser tão idiota? https://t.co/7Nf6d6qgyb
@thehill The FDA is a captured agency whose former commissioner is a paid salesman for Pfizer - Scott Gottlieb. On the NIH website: https://t.co/Fy3zEPX506 “found that ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86%”
@thehill I’m sure you know this, but the FDA is a captured agency. Paper on the NIH website: https://t.co/Fy3zEPX506 “Another recent review found that ivermectin reduced deaths by 75%.”
@MarKes1900 @irEnriqueCortes Deze was al uit juni 2021. Latere onderzoeken bevestigen dit. Geldt ook voor de zgn “chloormiddelen”. Ook die werken, HCQ en CQ. Maar mochten niet werken, want geen geld aan te verdienen. Je hebt experimentele gentherapie inges
@swachsman @DanielCameronAG Literally NO ONE pushed bleach and ivermectin saved many lives and would have saved more had they not banned it... https://t.co/bGPcBLFZ7N
@smartalek180 @PamKeithFL THIS is the reality. Read it all the way through. I am also posting a screenshot of the article towards the bottom showing 62% better outcome using Ivermectin. https://t.co/VJ3TFZqcGY https://t.co/JoVNdlHWT0
@UMFL2002 @utahmom333 @DC_Draino They were threatening Doctors medical licenses during the height of the pandemic for prescribing this. It works. They know it works. You people are uninformed. https://t.co/982mkyqSNz
@giusbrindisi "Ivermectina per la prevenzione e il trattamento dell'infezione da COVID-19: una revisione sistematica, una meta-analisi e un'analisi sequenziale di prova per informare le linee guida cliniche" https://t.co/ULj6rRP6Ia
@heyiamherfhd @Silje_Schevig @CiViX @oleMMoen @wolfgangwee Mer morsomt i den tråden - f.eks. bruker hun Russel Blaylock som kilde og promoterer Hydroxychloroquine. @civix det og - og det handlet også om kildebruk - en rapport av "grifterne" i FLCCC (Kory/
I wish we could trust the peer-review process. Happy sciencing: https://t.co/N7eQnFEONv ———————— https://t.co/aXrOYcpVBF; https://t.co/BaWjhzbX3f; I believe ivermectin works because of the additional anecdotal evidence, e.g., doctors & patients bot
@heyiamherfhd @Silje_Schevig @CiViX @oleMMoen @wolfgangwee Kan det ha vært Bryant et al? Hun har brukt den for å promotere ivermektin ved flere anledninger. Når to studier ble trukket, støttet ikke dataene konklusjonen lenger. Vedlagt Expression of C
@reh_gal_axy @DebbieAndrle @charliekirk11 So you think dozens of countries lied to promote one of the safest and cheapest drugs on the planet. That does not make sense. https://t.co/8Us8f8Yp1i https://t.co/BvhEWgPjlN. https://t.co/uTkuyoVtnr. https://t.co
@lmcell2 @GreyscaleNFT @CraigRosenbaum4 @NotHoodlum How about you read the conclusion of this credible study that changed my mind? https://t.co/5yscJMtKqm
@CollinRugg @staywokepatriot Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally
@PMizunoMP64 A metanalysis of non rigged studies disagrees. https://t.co/vOXaPUTYYI
@PMizunoMP64 @TankMan19609384 @ztisdale @CTVNews Remember when you dip💩s used to spew your "trust the science" 🐴💩, all while censoring and suppressing science. Well now there is science. https://t.co/vOXaPUTYYI
@dpmom3 @catturd2 This was known, and suppressed in 2021. You must like it the the government & the media lie to you. https://t.co/9Hdmz0Lh4Z
@krassenstein @Hot_Takes10 WHO lists Ivermectin as an "essential" medicine so it's safe. https://t.co/yKu4WJRLG6 NIH: "Health professionals should strongly consider its use, in both treatment and prophylaxis." https://t.co/c3uHs6LHMn The anecdotal evidenc
@neilh2o @JohnWSCarpente1 @DrJBhattacharya Meta-analysis of 15 RCTs showed a statistically significant effect on the hard end-point of mortality: https://t.co/6819oCRNoD I'd be interested to know what you think the incentive would be for researchers to f
@nomnompom29 @You_re_aRetar_D @Old_Millennia1 @BretWeinstein “Given the evidence of efficacy, safety, low cost, and current death rates, ivermectin is likely to have an impact on health and economic outcomes of the pandemic across many countries.” Studies
@charliekirk11 Studies by NIH show good benefit 👍 https://t.co/7nKhxd5QC3
@DougGullickson @dpmom3 @catturd2 As it relates to Ivermectin? https://t.co/KF2E4CAtrk
@LawrenceForbe16 @Enoughi10883551 @catturd2 Yes it does. https://t.co/Joic1CVofY
@PaulaHu17433057 @truth_finder40 @dpmom3 @catturd2 This study? 👇Ivermectin wasn’t profitable. Your Dr is an employee of a large hospital system that was making money off the jabs. He or she followed orders from a CEO who most likely doesn’t have a medical
@PaulaHu17433057 @truth_finder40 @dpmom3 @catturd2 You are completely wrong. Proven effective 2 years ago. 👇👇👇 https://t.co/tCv1GQZX1S
@dpmom3 @Dre_Dre_Dre_Dre @catturd2 We drink water and breathe air like dogs and cats. Using your logic we’re fucked…. Ivermectin effective against Covid. 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 https://t.co/tCv1GQZX1S
@dpmom3 @LASprayguy @catturd2 Actually you are. You’re still brainwashed. It’s ok to wake up. Ivermectin was proven effective against Covid years ago. https://t.co/tCv1GQZX1S
@dpmom3 @Deiondre_N_Nate @FluffyScowls @SeptembersRain @catturd2 Wake up… Ivermectin was proven very effective against Covid 2 years ago. https://t.co/tCv1GQZX1S
@dpmom3 @d_tophat @SmittysView @catturd2 You’re smrtr (👈 joke) than this right? Stop being yet another tool used by big Pharma, corrupt politicians, bureaucrats & power hungry freaks that enrich themselves through deception. In 2021 Ivermectin was abso
@krassenstein This study says “Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin.” https://t.co/p2ToHU6abs
@choctaw Here’s the Bryant meta: https://t.co/NJMgDXY8Mc
@Aliphaire @alexander_nanci @NotHoodlum Please read the conclusions of the study that changed my mind, or can't your mind be changed? https://t.co/5yscJMtKqm
@aliswisel @blackskymonkey @NotHoodlum How about the conclusion on this one that changed my mind? https://t.co/5yscJMtKqm
@jsnbase @NotHoodlum Please read the conclusion that changed my mind: https://t.co/5yscJMtKqm
@jsnbase @ByzantineDixie @NotHoodlum Just read the conclusion that changed my mind: https://t.co/5yscJMtKqm
@alexander_nanci @NotHoodlum Sarcasm is the last bastion of a weak mind (profile). Please read the conclusion and then apologize, but since you're small, you won't. https://t.co/5yscJMtKqm
@labellaluna11 @alexander_nanci @NotHoodlum Please read the conclusion and then apologize, you fucking moron. https://t.co/5yscJMtKqm
@KyndaBennett @NotHoodlum Please read the conclusion. I don't open my mouth unless I know what I'm talking about. You are one individual, with a unique physiology. Don't expect it to work for everyone, or are you just that ego-centric? https://t.co/5yscJMt
Remember the Horse wormer Jokes Democrats told because they were brainwashed into believing ivermectin didn't work????Conclusions: Repurposed medicines may have a role against the covid. https://t.co/Tgs2qV9PCq
@VivianSchwart15 @charliekirk11 Conclusions: Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin... The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the
@HouseOfSchwa @unhealthytruth I think unless you actually know what you’re talking about either through clinical experience or through the study of available science you shouldn’t opine on medical treatments and their efficacy. https://t.co/cxFXpyvJS5
@AnnetteRockwe10 @maolesen Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. https://t.co/6sGWTMrkJa
RT @realrobdurden: Reminder: I got banned from @YouTube for discussing the following meta analyses on IVM https://t.co/NJMgDXY8Mc
RT @UseCommonSenses: @krassenstein That’s a lot of typing when one screen shot from the NIH website can call out your BS https://t.co/Klmz…
@krassenstein That’s a lot of typing when one screen shot from the NIH website can call out your BS https://t.co/Klmziq91jh https://t.co/sgEC78EIa1
@themeparktrib Stick to theme park news. https://t.co/yn2eqKYfTD
@themeparktrib @wdwpro1 You're dumb. "Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin (average risk ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.19–0.73; n = 2438; I2 = 49%; moderate-certainty evidence)" https:
@FreedomKiki28 @CouldaBeenKilld @US_FDA Yep. Lots of studies show positive results when using ivermectin to treat covid. We can't expect someone who only gets their news from entities sponsored by Pfizer to know that, though. https://t.co/xvCq6F1kJt
RT @JeffDuntemann: @HectorABadger @ChicagoDJLegend "Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with n…