@chrislevionnois @otsdoug @LauraLoomer @realDonaldTrump Horse paste, good for the body and great taste - Conclusions: Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. https://t.co/xjE6hc6ojC
RT @morphman777: @DrSusanOliver1 Something from a more reputable source https://t.co/0GxlUnNM5f
@DrSusanOliver1 Something from a more reputable source https://t.co/0GxlUnNM5f
@mindymayhem @real_seeking @LauraMiers Meta-analysis of studies prove your one flawed study is wrong. https://t.co/EdMnshkyTS https://t.co/4mMsfARCfS
@fuckronaut777 @reddit_lies "No" studies? https://t.co/k7pd4H9b0p
@ASkiba01 @DwWork2 @krassenstein @BWay124 Wearing masks doesnt prevent you from getting covid or spreading it. They are ineffective against the size of the virus. Yet people were forced to wear them No harm in using ivermectin, and there could be positi
@BarbYohn1 @EileneLK037043 @RAYRAY70290239 @IanJaeger29 Bidens rallies were small because nobody cared to come. Biden couldn't get a crowd of convicts to attend his rallies if he handed out weekend furloughs. And you still believe the horse medicine lie? Y
@Princesamexica5 @JuanK4rlo julio 2021 el NIH difama a la ivermectina, que es eficaz, barata y accesible. Se prohibió su pauta en hospitales públicos. Con la ivermectina en fase temprana no hubieran podido inocular (y cobrar) 15.000 millones de vacunas ht
RT @Mattadork1: @EmperorGrinnar @nickcooper1110 @TerrenceWBrown @Sour___Peach @TPBlue4 @Fartknocker22It @charliekirk11 how about the lie th…
@EmperorGrinnar @nickcooper1110 @TerrenceWBrown @Sour___Peach @TPBlue4 @Fartknocker22It @charliekirk11 how about the lie that ivermectin is only a "horse medication" and shouldn't be taken for covid 19... oops guess that was wrong as well... https://t.co/4
I wonder if the left will start hiding the truth again? https://t.co/vM2C0pxDV5
Hey #Media If we were suppose to trust the science why did you all lie about the effectiveness of Ivermectin? Here’s what the national library of medicine has to say https://t.co/Dzp8GYdqMY
@Gitmo99 @criticaleye170 Government report https://t.co/AVlZ8zRbN0
@DONT_B_A_DOCTOR @molsjames @BagaiDr @__philipn__ https://t.co/kS0baPgNad just one of many studies showing efficacy of ivermectin.
RT @davidjthunder: 3/ MANY Covid deaths & harms to health could have been averted by a more permissive approach to the regulation of safe,…
@Bertie_222 @rt7683 @yodelodwho you even cited the bryant meta analysis, which now has an expression of concern. Ivermectin shills crack me up https://t.co/kMCOEOxviG https://t.co/d8x2KlDMCS
@WTNH https://t.co/U7zJfDzVur "evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin"
RT @DocteurPEB1: @boutaour @DIVIZIO1 Un médecin "informé" uniquement pas les visiteurs médicaux payés par l'Industrie Pharmaceutique c'est…
@DrSharkBird It will be this one. I haven't read it but a quick search on here and found it within seconds. As I said I think we're done here. Have a good one. https://t.co/fEh9phxtix
@TruthSeeker454 @AlastairMcA30 @VigilantFox @drpaulmarik1 https://t.co/BlyCmsxYnw https://t.co/8CQBiv7Y0h I’ve got more studies if you can’t find any yourself.
@thehill Really? https://t.co/BEkiZ4R1fm “Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease.”
@Bill_Gro @MdBreathe @cvspharmacy The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally. https://t.co/BEkiZ4R1fm
@Shlant_ @jags4life89 @tmgoldenberg1 @charliekirk11 but the fact they acted like that was the ONLY type of ivermectin there was, when there 100% was a human version, and we have stuff like this https://t.co/45uAF5HDKq that comes out... i don't trust the FD
@jerminycricket @Tazerrtot @CryptoKing1116 @novva99x @MorePerfectUS https://t.co/45uAF5HDKq have a nice day, arguing with you is pointless when you want to keep lying about the human version of the medication because people are taking the HIGHER DOSAGE not
@jerminycricket @Tazerrtot @CryptoKing1116 @novva99x @MorePerfectUS you just make yourself look stupid... you keep claiming i don't do research, but then you refuse to do research https://t.co/45uAF5HDKq the human version is aproved by the FDA (not specifi
@jerminycricket @Tazerrtot @CryptoKing1116 @novva99x @MorePerfectUS and see now you call it a horse dewormer... and you want to say that i just use talking points... that is the biggest talking point of all... it isn't horse dewormer https://t.co/45uAF5HDK
@jerminycricket @Tazerrtot @CryptoKing1116 @novva99x @MorePerfectUS also you should look into the ivermectin thing... https://t.co/45uAF5HDKq instead of continuing to be brainwashed... i love how you told me i don't do research while sending the info of me
@Ronan925 @Dr_Steph_GAYET Ca c'est de la merde ?https://t.co/TBk5cNRziT
RT @Doctor_I_am_The: Death is worse when you knowingly represent something you know is wrong. You are then a part of that death.
@TalentlessJoe @Eplurib00257384 @fireman19733 @alx Now don’t you feel silly. https://t.co/8yFUFdVMEG
RT @Doctor_I_am_The: Death is worse when you knowingly represent something you know is wrong. You are then a part of that death.
@Rowland808 @JeremySpecials @libsoftiktok get your research from actual sources and not the news spewing garbage like "horse medication" https://t.co/45uAF5HDKq
@ChatSecouriste Tout et n'importe quoi ? https://t.co/TBk5cNRziT
RT @ColinDebunks: @Covid19Critical @PierreKory @shannonjoyradi0 Then we have Bryant, Lawrie et al - expression of concern https://t.co/lhbU…
@Covid19Critical @PierreKory @shannonjoyradi0 Then we have Bryant, Lawrie et al - expression of concern https://t.co/lhbU2d1Lnx
@MarkWendrich @Me_xNL Dit is dan jammer. Dus deze is correct? https://t.co/3W9nbFyK8D
@zap_lock Ivermectin, the cheap effective wonder drug 👍 https://t.co/XPNvsnEVSY
RT @Doctor_I_am_The: Death is worse when you knowingly represent something you know is wrong. You are then a part of that death.
@MarkWendrich @Me_xNL Omdat er zoveel onderzoek is gedaan over de korte en lange termijn gevolgen van studies vindt u dit? Studies spreken elkaar tegen en er een grote studie naar een effect van een goedkoop generiek medicijn? Denkt u dat die artsen die
Hieronder: "Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease." https://t.co/3W9nbFyK8D Echter
Die @volkspartei reitet ein totes Pferd. Eine der meistzitierten Studie a l l e r Zeiten: begutachtete Metastudie mit einem Altimetric score von 26,697, an 8. Stelle von ca. 18 Millionen Studien. Stand Feb. 21. https://t.co/UEYOMTDwR9
RT @Doctor_I_am_The: Death is worse when you knowingly represent something you know is wrong. You are then a part of that death.
RT @RonsRant: https://t.co/GDyuxemWMx @ABridgen @Doctor_I_am_The @RealGeorgeWebb1 Why do we get negativity about this drug? Here is one…
RT @Doctor_I_am_The: Death is worse when you knowingly represent something you know is wrong. You are then a part of that death.
RT @RonsRant: https://t.co/GDyuxemWMx @ABridgen @Doctor_I_am_The @RealGeorgeWebb1 Why do we get negativity about this drug? Here is one…
RT @Doctor_I_am_The: Death is worse when you knowingly represent something you know is wrong. You are then a part of that death.
RT @Doctor_I_am_The: Death is worse when you knowingly represent something you know is wrong. You are then a part of that death.
Death is worse when you knowingly represent something you know is wrong. You are then a part of that death.
https://t.co/GDyuxemWMx @ABridgen @Doctor_I_am_The @RealGeorgeWebb1 Why do we get negativity about this drug? Here is one positive. You see, you can't do worse than dead. Stop it! The negativeity.
@docmartin22 @MdBreathe Is snark supposed to hide the fact that you are absolutely lying? https://t.co/WPHSyOLXRE
@Ben_Hur_Lopes @AnaCarolPecanha Pode crer. Quem te paga para ser tão idiota? https://t.co/7Nf6d6qgyb
@thehill The FDA is a captured agency whose former commissioner is a paid salesman for Pfizer - Scott Gottlieb. On the NIH website: https://t.co/Fy3zEPX506 “found that ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86%”
@thehill I’m sure you know this, but the FDA is a captured agency. Paper on the NIH website: https://t.co/Fy3zEPX506 “Another recent review found that ivermectin reduced deaths by 75%.”
@MarKes1900 @irEnriqueCortes Deze was al uit juni 2021. Latere onderzoeken bevestigen dit. Geldt ook voor de zgn “chloormiddelen”. Ook die werken, HCQ en CQ. Maar mochten niet werken, want geen geld aan te verdienen. Je hebt experimentele gentherapie inges
@swachsman @DanielCameronAG Literally NO ONE pushed bleach and ivermectin saved many lives and would have saved more had they not banned it... https://t.co/bGPcBLFZ7N
@smartalek180 @PamKeithFL THIS is the reality. Read it all the way through. I am also posting a screenshot of the article towards the bottom showing 62% better outcome using Ivermectin. https://t.co/VJ3TFZqcGY https://t.co/JoVNdlHWT0
@UMFL2002 @utahmom333 @DC_Draino They were threatening Doctors medical licenses during the height of the pandemic for prescribing this. It works. They know it works. You people are uninformed. https://t.co/982mkyqSNz
@giusbrindisi "Ivermectina per la prevenzione e il trattamento dell'infezione da COVID-19: una revisione sistematica, una meta-analisi e un'analisi sequenziale di prova per informare le linee guida cliniche" https://t.co/ULj6rRP6Ia
@heyiamherfhd @Silje_Schevig @CiViX @oleMMoen @wolfgangwee Mer morsomt i den tråden - f.eks. bruker hun Russel Blaylock som kilde og promoterer Hydroxychloroquine. @civix det og - og det handlet også om kildebruk - en rapport av "grifterne" i FLCCC (Kory/
I wish we could trust the peer-review process. Happy sciencing: https://t.co/N7eQnFEONv ———————— https://t.co/aXrOYcpVBF; https://t.co/BaWjhzbX3f; I believe ivermectin works because of the additional anecdotal evidence, e.g., doctors & patients bot
@heyiamherfhd @Silje_Schevig @CiViX @oleMMoen @wolfgangwee Kan det ha vært Bryant et al? Hun har brukt den for å promotere ivermektin ved flere anledninger. Når to studier ble trukket, støttet ikke dataene konklusjonen lenger. Vedlagt Expression of C
@reh_gal_axy @DebbieAndrle @charliekirk11 So you think dozens of countries lied to promote one of the safest and cheapest drugs on the planet. That does not make sense. https://t.co/8Us8f8Yp1i https://t.co/BvhEWgPjlN. https://t.co/uTkuyoVtnr. https://t.co
@norwegiangamer9 @Guissep58163752 @StarTribune Even FauXi's NIH admits it now. 🤡 https://t.co/6OZkSVpdGa
@lmcell2 @GreyscaleNFT @CraigRosenbaum4 @NotHoodlum How about you read the conclusion of this credible study that changed my mind? https://t.co/5yscJMtKqm
@CollinRugg @staywokepatriot Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally
@PMizunoMP64 A metanalysis of non rigged studies disagrees. https://t.co/vOXaPUTYYI
@PMizunoMP64 @TankMan19609384 @ztisdale @CTVNews Remember when you dip💩s used to spew your "trust the science" 🐴💩, all while censoring and suppressing science. Well now there is science. https://t.co/vOXaPUTYYI