@dpmom3 @catturd2 This was known, and suppressed in 2021. You must like it the the government & the media lie to you. https://t.co/9Hdmz0Lh4Z
@krassenstein @Hot_Takes10 WHO lists Ivermectin as an "essential" medicine so it's safe. https://t.co/yKu4WJRLG6 NIH: "Health professionals should strongly consider its use, in both treatment and prophylaxis." https://t.co/c3uHs6LHMn The anecdotal evidenc
@neilh2o @JohnWSCarpente1 @DrJBhattacharya Meta-analysis of 15 RCTs showed a statistically significant effect on the hard end-point of mortality: https://t.co/6819oCRNoD I'd be interested to know what you think the incentive would be for researchers to f
@nomnompom29 @You_re_aRetar_D @Old_Millennia1 @BretWeinstein “Given the evidence of efficacy, safety, low cost, and current death rates, ivermectin is likely to have an impact on health and economic outcomes of the pandemic across many countries.” Studies
@charliekirk11 Studies by NIH show good benefit 👍 https://t.co/7nKhxd5QC3
@DougGullickson @dpmom3 @catturd2 As it relates to Ivermectin? https://t.co/KF2E4CAtrk
@LawrenceForbe16 @Enoughi10883551 @catturd2 Yes it does. https://t.co/Joic1CVofY
@PaulaHu17433057 @truth_finder40 @dpmom3 @catturd2 This study? 👇Ivermectin wasn’t profitable. Your Dr is an employee of a large hospital system that was making money off the jabs. He or she followed orders from a CEO who most likely doesn’t have a medical
@PaulaHu17433057 @truth_finder40 @dpmom3 @catturd2 You are completely wrong. Proven effective 2 years ago. 👇👇👇 https://t.co/tCv1GQZX1S
@dpmom3 @Dre_Dre_Dre_Dre @catturd2 We drink water and breathe air like dogs and cats. Using your logic we’re fucked…. Ivermectin effective against Covid. 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 https://t.co/tCv1GQZX1S
@dpmom3 @LASprayguy @catturd2 Actually you are. You’re still brainwashed. It’s ok to wake up. Ivermectin was proven effective against Covid years ago. https://t.co/tCv1GQZX1S
@dpmom3 @Deiondre_N_Nate @FluffyScowls @SeptembersRain @catturd2 Wake up… Ivermectin was proven very effective against Covid 2 years ago. https://t.co/tCv1GQZX1S
@dpmom3 @d_tophat @SmittysView @catturd2 You’re smrtr (👈 joke) than this right? Stop being yet another tool used by big Pharma, corrupt politicians, bureaucrats & power hungry freaks that enrich themselves through deception. In 2021 Ivermectin was abso
@krassenstein This study says “Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin.” https://t.co/p2ToHU6abs
@choctaw Here’s the Bryant meta: https://t.co/NJMgDXY8Mc
@Aliphaire @alexander_nanci @NotHoodlum Please read the conclusions of the study that changed my mind, or can't your mind be changed? https://t.co/5yscJMtKqm
@aliswisel @blackskymonkey @NotHoodlum How about the conclusion on this one that changed my mind? https://t.co/5yscJMtKqm
@jsnbase @NotHoodlum Please read the conclusion that changed my mind: https://t.co/5yscJMtKqm
@jsnbase @ByzantineDixie @NotHoodlum Just read the conclusion that changed my mind: https://t.co/5yscJMtKqm
@alexander_nanci @NotHoodlum Sarcasm is the last bastion of a weak mind (profile). Please read the conclusion and then apologize, but since you're small, you won't. https://t.co/5yscJMtKqm
@labellaluna11 @alexander_nanci @NotHoodlum Please read the conclusion and then apologize, you fucking moron. https://t.co/5yscJMtKqm
@KyndaBennett @NotHoodlum Please read the conclusion. I don't open my mouth unless I know what I'm talking about. You are one individual, with a unique physiology. Don't expect it to work for everyone, or are you just that ego-centric? https://t.co/5yscJMt
Remember the Horse wormer Jokes Democrats told because they were brainwashed into believing ivermectin didn't work????Conclusions: Repurposed medicines may have a role against the covid. https://t.co/Tgs2qV9PCq
@VivianSchwart15 @charliekirk11 Conclusions: Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin... The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the
@HouseOfSchwa @unhealthytruth I think unless you actually know what you’re talking about either through clinical experience or through the study of available science you shouldn’t opine on medical treatments and their efficacy. https://t.co/cxFXpyvJS5
@AnnetteRockwe10 @maolesen Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. https://t.co/6sGWTMrkJa
RT @realrobdurden: Reminder: I got banned from @YouTube for discussing the following meta analyses on IVM https://t.co/NJMgDXY8Mc
RT @UseCommonSenses: @krassenstein That’s a lot of typing when one screen shot from the NIH website can call out your BS https://t.co/Klmz…
@krassenstein That’s a lot of typing when one screen shot from the NIH website can call out your BS https://t.co/Klmziq91jh https://t.co/sgEC78EIa1
@themeparktrib Stick to theme park news. https://t.co/yn2eqKYfTD
@themeparktrib @wdwpro1 You're dumb. "Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin (average risk ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.19–0.73; n = 2438; I2 = 49%; moderate-certainty evidence)" https:
@FreedomKiki28 @CouldaBeenKilld @US_FDA Yep. Lots of studies show positive results when using ivermectin to treat covid. We can't expect someone who only gets their news from entities sponsored by Pfizer to know that, though. https://t.co/xvCq6F1kJt
RT @JeffDuntemann: @HectorABadger @ChicagoDJLegend "Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with n…
@HectorABadger @ChicagoDJLegend "Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin (average risk ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.19–0.73; n = 2438; I2 = 49%; moderate-certainty evidence)." #Ivermecti
RT @realrobdurden: Reminder: I got banned from @YouTube for discussing the following meta analyses on IVM https://t.co/NJMgDXY8Mc
@JessicaNonGrata https://t.co/wkRQ4OWJFv Conclusion: "Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin."
@charliekirk11 https://t.co/wkRQ4OWJFv Here is a meta analysis of ivermectin studies for anyone curious. Conclusion: "Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin."
@AlBowers1 @MdBreathe @US_FDA Wow! Truth. Do your research. You’ve been lied to.
@KevinFHalosFan @DianneCallaha16 @RepMTG Here's another: https://t.co/vAWqornMDm When I offhandedly said "look at the studies", I was referring to many I have seen posted on X but noted doctors.
@AlBowers1 @SCBuckeye_G @MdBreathe @US_FDA Yes it does. https://t.co/gKo8BkJbP4
RT @realrobdurden: Reminder: I got banned from @YouTube for discussing the following meta analyses on IVM https://t.co/NJMgDXY8Mc
@CrisprCAS97 @Wonderfuldayz @LGBFJB1776 @ArchKennedy @wonderworld2016 There are studies indicating Ivermectin is effective vs. Covid. When Covid hit (a novel coronavirus), drs had no vaccines/treatment regimens and used their skills to treat their pts. Thu
RT @realrobdurden: Reminder: I got banned from @YouTube for discussing the following meta analyses on IVM https://t.co/NJMgDXY8Mc
Reminder: I got banned from @YouTube for discussing the following meta analyses on IVM https://t.co/NJMgDXY8Mc
@AlexBerenson I guess these guys are just plain wrong. "Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease
@wisconsinhuman1 @DC_Draino Nope The "studies" showing negligible benefit were rigged. They intentionally did the studies in countries where ivermectin is sold in vending machines. There was no control group https://t.co/PuQET1fWSH
@AlexBerenson So, these doctors are all wet? "Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease." https:/
@Elennar_Linwen @RoyRoy65329883 @JoJoFromJerz I would encourage you to read one of the now nearly 100 studies that suggest devastating efficacy against Covid. https://t.co/froJP4P1OP
@donnie_ballsack @FunctionCG Even the NIH disagrees 🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/2Gxp4yNILI
@anja_weimer @dr_jon_l @DrJohnCampbell3 @DrAseemMalhotra @P_McCulloughMD @BretWeinstein @gtuckerkellogg Not really. There is huge amount of evidence that it works. And big pharma evidence that it does not work. Pharma had a financial incentive to discredit
@MissQueenLiz @PhillipsNanl @VigilantFox @Juliesnark1731 R u kidding? One of the earliest meta-analysis to date showed than 62% efficacy ... https://t.co/kfBFlDB7gk
@TheNotoriousLMC It's efficacy has been known since June 2021 https://t.co/c3uHs6LHMn https://t.co/elMte8VRVZ
@LmaoUPaid4Blue @Sebike88 @bamajayt @tucheer83 not a dewormer it is a antiparasitic treatment with antiviral and anti-inflamatory properties to it stop spreading misinformation because you democrats can't just look up 1 medication https://t.co/45uAF5HDKq
@LmaoUPaid4Blue @bamajayt @tucheer83 yep totally gonna trust the FDA falling for the "its horse medicine" line when its literally a proven medication to be used for humans, how about instead of the FDA i trust the NIH? https://t.co/45uAF5HDKq
@LaurenRobison96 @PhillipsNanl @VigilantFox @Juliesnark1731 also i just found this while digging a little deeper https://t.co/45uAF5HDKq apparently it does have antiviral properties
RT @durnyank: @USBornNRaised Read for yourself. There were SEVERAL studies conducted that proved Ivermectin was effective, but the CDC and…
@bJrjA3Lp7btBjhq @OngakuBakaDesu @Ripuko_3 @ASKA_Pop_ASKA @kharaguchi イベルメクチンの有効性についてCDCやFDAが隠蔽しようとしたと、こちら論文のリンクつきです。
RT @RDVSVNZLA: @JulioRazona Y lo más grave es que sabían las elites desde hace bastante tiempo que la ivermectina funcionaba muy bien... Aq…
RT @durnyank: @USBornNRaised Read for yourself. There were SEVERAL studies conducted that proved Ivermectin was effective, but the CDC and…
RT @durnyank: @USBornNRaised Read for yourself. There were SEVERAL studies conducted that proved Ivermectin was effective, but the CDC and…
RT @durnyank: @USBornNRaised Read for yourself. There were SEVERAL studies conducted that proved Ivermectin was effective, but the CDC and…
RT @durnyank: @LeanCentrist @USBornNRaised I can point you to something the FDA covered up: https://t.co/VJ3TFZqcGY
@USBornNRaised Read for yourself. There were SEVERAL studies conducted that proved Ivermectin was effective, but the CDC and FDA covered up the results of most of these studies so they could push the EUA. https://t.co/VJ3TFZqcGY
@LeanCentrist @USBornNRaised I can point you to something the FDA covered up: https://t.co/VJ3TFZqcGY
Can't make much money when it's $2.90 for 100 12-mg tablets though. Can make waaay more money off panacea mRNA vaccines. Someone should tell the WHO to stop giving people horse dewormer. Crazy WHO.