@jordanbpeterson And then there is this: https://t.co/f6tY1XmVQj
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @PierreKory @JoseGonzalesZa1 Re: "Read more medical literature" Wouldn't include your retracted COVID-19 studies, Kory…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @PierreKory @JoseGonzalesZa1 Re: "Read more medical literature" Wouldn't include your retracted COVID-19 studies, Kory…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @PierreKory @JoseGonzalesZa1 Re: "Read more medical literature" Wouldn't include your retracted COVID-19 studies, Kory…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @PierreKory @JoseGonzalesZa1 Re: "Read more medical literature" Wouldn't include your retracted COVID-19 studies, Kory…
@PierreKory @JoseGonzalesZa1 Re: "Read more medical literature" Wouldn't include your retracted COVID-19 studies, Kory, nor your research that includes fraudulent/retracted work + which has an expression on concern attached to it. https://t.co/9WPnB5y2B8
@AlastairMcA30 @Mickandhismusic Meta analysis here. https://t.co/iiQ25tgyMu
RT @jeffreyatucker: "Ivermectin is likely to be an equitable, acceptable, and feasible global intervention against COVID-19. Health profess…
RT @kylamb8: FWIW, this is a meta analysis of RCTs on Ivermectin with a total of 3,406 participants included in the analysis. There have be…
@hilaryluros @patriottakes But Ivermectin works. https://t.co/fSCpGh5nFg
@CongasMaracas "Nous avons inclus des études comparant le médicament à un placebo, à l'absence de traitement, aux soins standards ou à des traitements de la COVID-19 dont on sait qu'ils fonctionnent dans une certaine mesure, comme le remdesivir.."?? Really
@ouidheda ...oh, I did... https://t.co/4rvcu3on4V
@jessicatNY @WFKARS @meganranney @EmbryEthan https://t.co/jE7k7Xx624 #FollowTheScience I also have listened to folks who've talked about this for roughly two years, like @BretWeinstein & @heathereheying. Recently, Bret & @BenjaminABoyce spoke abo
1/2 Adapted Ivermectin is an effective drug against Covid. Separate paper⬇️ https://t.co/NAImNbKSJZ Dr A Hill researching Ivermectin for the WHO. Results paper obfuscated then dropped. Dr T Lawrie challenges him Jan 2021 MSM counters Ivermectin research.
RT @VDJH44B9bbKQSaK: American Journal of Therapeutics 2021年、イベルメクチソがパンデミックに使用されるべきであったことを示す査読付きメタ分析が行われました。 なぜ使われなかったのでしょうか? https://t.co/e…
@fredweisg @BozadaLou @jokerfyre719 @HillaryClinton Wow, you're extra gullible for someone supposedly associated with farming: https://t.co/UB6arQxrx4 https://t.co/IvKVzxNuC0 https://t.co/bnR5ZLthKk
@ADHPIO https://t.co/JdV4nSAuMU For COVID!
@DrDavidNL @wingsinn @HoeyberghsJeff Gelieve niet langer verkeerde cijfers en vals nieuws betreffende Corona te verspreiden. Japan : 1 vac. 80,8%, 2 vac. 79,7%, sterfte 0,046% Denemarken : 83,1%, 81,3%, 0,2% Israël : 72,7%, 66,4%, 0,3% BE : 79,8%, 78,6%, 0
RT @kkkkkkk777: 昨年6月にパブリッシュされ、撤回されていないイベルメクチン有効論文❣️ COVID-19感染の予防と治療のためのイベルメクチン:系統的レビュー、メタアナリシス、および臨床ガイドラインに情報を提供するための試験的逐次分析 2021年6月21日…
@jsj11113 @johnnylawdog @nwmidwife @nncyhllrd @mizdefiant Have you done your research https://t.co/eHbGrk8nXS
@IrfanDhalla How about rolling out Ivermectin as early treatment, given it's proven efficacy? Let me guess, you're getting big $$$ to promote the death jab, eh? https://t.co/hTSZfL9ys9 https://t.co/ueST5y34zW https://t.co/JDqaPClAGL https://t.co/5s8JN5Q1Xu
@parkerdiggon @jackcrevalle @honorandmagic @mizdefiant It's not that cut and dry unfortunately. Most studies were made to look ineffective by giving the drug late in the virus cycle. The point is, it was suppressed when the data was not clear. https://t.co
@nncyhllrd @mizdefiant Listen dummy. Stay in your lane. You aren't smart enough to understand what you are spewing. You should be everything but you... https://t.co/ydLazSyXDq
@parkerdiggon @jackcrevalle @honorandmagic @mizdefiant That's not true at all. The data the media keeps pushing were from studies that took ivermectin late in it's cycle. It has shown to be effective when taken early. https://t.co/rI7P5eB94D
@PharmacistMama Are pharmacists going to hand out Ivermectin then, given it's proven efficacy or are you just going to continue denying lifesaving medication? https://t.co/hTSZfLa6hH https://t.co/ueST5y3Cpu https://t.co/JDqaPCm8wj https://t.co/5s8JN5QzN2
@art_burke @mizdefiant Hi Art, you big dummy. https://t.co/GI4N5l2kYy
@BogochIsaac Are the pharmacies going to distribute Ivermectin? Wouldn't that be awesome, given it's proven efficacy? https://t.co/hTSZfL9ys9 https://t.co/ueST5y34zW https://t.co/JDqaPClAGL https://t.co/5s8JN5Q1Xu https://t.co/5Q7iFv4YKK
@Qu_Cat_2 @mizdefiant Here's why you should be taking "horse dewormer": https://t.co/s0inUrrTcS
@LlessurCoral7 @NeilJamesMiller @writeonleah @Rachel_Smalley Turns out it was stock footage in the news piece so the Queen isnt proven to be using it - however the efficacy of its use has been academically accepted post media hysteria as seen here https://
@LlessurCoral7 @NeilJamesMiller @writeonleah @Rachel_Smalley Yeah for sure I saw that myself, the news showed it but it was stock footage. However ivermectin use in early covid treatment is still an accepted and viable treatment worldwide - journal article
@Up4Yes @jonnajarian Please explain this then https://t.co/UTwpQIUioW Journal of American Therapeutics You can’t because it would break your psyche if you admitted you’ve been so wrong for so long 🤷♂️ https://t.co/Er9aDNGI2y
@ScienceAccount1 @mobindondon @LarrabeeNed @beyondtheRK And, @ScienceAccount1, do you admit that you used a screenshot from a meta-analysis that relied on fraudulent + retracted research, (ex: Elgazzar et al.) when discussing what the results would show wi
The Soviet media continued to lionize Lysenko for more than 30 years. 30 YEARS. Even though not a single one of his theories or policies ever produced a grain of food. Even so, alternative methods were ridiculed and demonized. https://t.co/dQxgqg4Yed
@cindyray73 🙄 You see what I mean? You're going to reject everything I post because it doesn't fit into your lemming brain. https://t.co/yaY6be5NOJ
@Anjimomof4 @BadgerStew Except there actually was a study on Listerine, and hundreds on Ivermectin. So if you're talking about yourself, I guess I wouldn't call you dumb... just uninformed. As example: https://t.co/ymK77TVgGR https://t.co/TuL4mpzqmt
@sajidjavid
@RedigerKen @tinyhotopicbish @Kais3rd @no1_real_man Here is a list of data sets showing that the vaccines have negative efficacy. https://t.co/Kw6WJLhHOK Here is one meta analysis for ivermectin https://t.co/xoz0rrPnih there are hundreds of small studies
RT @originalmarkz: From your own government. It works. Big tech through censorship is responsible for many deaths. https://t.co/XS4vHqbCQ0
@Oidad3 Ivermectin: https://t.co/hTSZfL9ys9 https://t.co/ueST5y34zW https://t.co/JDqaPClAGL https://t.co/5s8JN5Q1Xu https://t.co/5Q7iFv4YKK It is really enough with parroting government propaganda, you are SO misinformed, you have NO science to proof what
@eff__mitch @AdrianDWerner @RileyWhittMusic @Circularish___ @MrKRudd What relevance does asserting ivermectin is animal medicine have? It is a drug made for humans too on the WHOs list of essential meds and is prescribed well over 100mil times per yr. Here
@AlanfromBigEasy @RagingHatred Hey dumbass.......the hOrSe pAsTe saves lives https://t.co/nHRSB55Rzq
"Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease." https://t.co/285kwDd6c4
@michael_goff You do realize that studies have shown IVERMECTIN WORKS to reduce COVID issues. Yeah? I'm assuming you've actually done your research? https://t.co/285kwDd6c4
RT @VDJH44B9bbKQSaK: American Journal of Therapeutics 2021年、イベルメクチソがパンデミックに使用されるべきであったことを示す査読付きメタ分析が行われました。 なぜ使われなかったのでしょうか? https://t.co/e…
@JosephFalco20 @DonnaIGlas @BehizyTweets Are you ignorant or a paid troll? Here, I googled this for you: https://t.co/Mw3q5pWnoA
RT @TrueDerekSloan: Study reveals that prophylactic use of Ivermectin reduced COVID infection by 86%. It’s time to follow the evidence-base…
RT @VDJH44B9bbKQSaK: American Journal of Therapeutics 2021年、イベルメクチソがパンデミックに使用されるべきであったことを示す査読付きメタ分析が行われました。 なぜ使われなかったのでしょうか? https://t.co/e…
RT @VDJH44B9bbKQSaK: American Journal of Therapeutics 2021年、イベルメクチソがパンデミックに使用されるべきであったことを示す査読付きメタ分析が行われました。 なぜ使われなかったのでしょうか? https://t.co/e…
@Y_Soup Maybe he's framing it wrong and may be doing a disservice by being so absolute in his response. Not a cure, but an effective therapy. https://t.co/iAudQ6j1gh
Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19... : American Journal of Therapeutics https://t.co/g271RWsfsR
@RichardWWard1 @justlikekevin @ScienceAccount1 @matemoticon @ianmSC Well, they're currently blatantly lying in order to pretend ivermectin works. So "troll" would be an apt name for them. https://t.co/HTRQwZ12yI